December 19, 2016
In reasons for judgment released earlier this year, the court in Scelsa v. Taylor, 2016 BCSC 1122 denied the plaintiff reimbursement of the $800.00 cost of an MRI. There was no dispute that the MRI was necessary, but the court held that the defendant should not pay the cost because “a publicly funded option was available” and the plaintiff had not demonstrated that the need for the MRI was “urgent”. The court said:
 The defendants have agreed to pay special damages of $6,002.60,
excluding only $800 claimed for a private MRI…The plaintiff failed to show an urgent need to obtain a private MRI when a publically funded option was available… Accordingly, the plaintiff is awarded special damages of $6,002.
The full text of the decision can be found here: http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2016/2016bcsc1122/2016bcsc1122.html?resultIndex=1
The McQuarrie Hunter Personal Injury Blog is maintained by the ICBC and personal injury practice group at McQuarrie Hunter LLP.
Parveen Karsan, Sarando Matheos, and Kirk Wirsig recognized in the 2024 edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada®
We are excited to announce Parveen Karsan, Sarando Matheos, and Kirk Wirsig have been selected for inclusion in the 2024 edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada®.Read more
Contra Proferentem in Canada and Your Insurance Claim Denial
When you are disabled due to an injury or an illness, the last thing you should have to deal with is a battle with an insurance company over the interpretation of complex…Read more